The court heard argument Tuesday in a dispute between wireless provider AT&T Mobility and a California couple who objected to being charged around $30 in sales tax for what they were told was a free cell phone.
Like many such contracts, the fine print of the agreement between AT&T and Liza and Vincent Concepcion calls for all disputes to be settled by arbitration and prohibits customers from joining forces in a class-action. The federal appeals court in San Francisco said that ban is unenforceable under California law.
The case is important because if the court rules for AT&T, it could greatly restrict the use of class actions, in which a party represents a much larger group, in disputes over contracts. AT&T is backed by an array of business interests, while consumer groups and the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund are among supporters of the Concepcions.
Links:
[1] http://www.ajc.com/business/court-hears-dispute-over-734583.html
[2] http://www.naacpldf.org/case-issue/att-mobility-llc-v-vincent-and-liza-concepcion
[3] http://twitter.com/home?status=Currently reading http://www.naacpldf.org/news/ap-court-hears-dispute-over-sales-tax-free-phone
[4] http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://www.naacpldf.org/news/ap-court-hears-dispute-over-sales-tax-free-phone
[5] http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&url=http://www.naacpldf.org/news/ap-court-hears-dispute-over-sales-tax-free-phone&title=AP%3A+Court+hears+dispute+over+sales+tax+on+%22free%22+phone
[6] http://del.icio.us/post?url=http://www.naacpldf.org/news/ap-court-hears-dispute-over-sales-tax-free-phone&title=AP%3A+Court+hears+dispute+over+sales+tax+on+%22free%22+phone
[7] http://www.naacpldf.org/printmail/news/ap-court-hears-dispute-over-sales-tax-free-phone
[8] http://www.naacpldf.org/print/news/ap-court-hears-dispute-over-sales-tax-free-phone