- About Us
- Our Work
- Get Involved
- Support Us
Case Updates7/06/11Civil Rights Organizations Settle Hurricane Katrina Housing Discrimination Case against HUD and Louisiana 4/08/11Post-Katrina Housing Case Continues After D.C. Circuit Ruling 11/17/10Road Home Brief Filed Addressing Appeals 9/22/10Another Victory on the Road Home 8/27/10Uneven Katrina recovery efforts often offered the most help to the most affluent 8/16/10Legal Defense Fund Wins Relief for Victims of Post- Katrina/Rita Housing Discrimination 7/19/10Federal Court Finds "Strong Inference” of Discrimination In Louisiana/HUD Post-Hurricane Housing Recovery Program But Barriers Persist 8/20/09NAACP Legal Defense Fund Testifies Before Congress on Discrimination in Katrina Related Housing Recovery Program 11/12/08LDF and Fair Housing Groups File Federal Lawsuit in Post-Katrina Housing Discrimination Case
Comments on Proposed APA 51 5/11/11
Plaintiff Reply Brief: Road Home 11/17/10
Injunction Order 9/22/10
Testimony of Matthew Colangelo, Director of the Economic Justice Group,NAACP Legal Defense &Educational Fund, Inc. 8/20/09
Fact Sheet 11/12/08
Economic Justice | Housing Discrimination
Following the devastating destruction of hurricanes Katrina and Rita, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the Louisiana Recovery Authority (LRA) established a home rebuilding program known as Road Home to get residents back to the region. With $11 billion in federal funds, the Road Home awards grants to Louisiana homeowners whose homes were damaged by the storms in 2005. In approving the funds for the Road Home, Congress required that the money be distributed on an equal opportunity basis and in a manner that affirmatively furthers fair housing in the area. The homeowners and fair housing groups suing HUD and the LRA (the Plaintiffs) allege HUD and the LRA have failed to aid black and white homeowners fairly, with black homeowners receiving repair grants that fall far shorter of meeting the cost of repair than grants to white homeowners.
The amount of a homeowner’s grant is determined based on the lesser of two amounts: the pre-storm value of an individual’s home or the cost of repairing the home. In New Orleans, as in many communities in the U.S., homes in predominantly black neighborhoods have lower market values than comparable homes in white neighborhoods. As a result, black homeowners’ grants are more likely to be based on the lower, pre-storm value of their homes rather than the cost of repairing the damage to their homes – even though the cost of repair is the same no matter what race the homeowner is. In contrast, white homeowner’s grants are larger and more likely to meet the repair costs. The Plaintiffs claim that using a grant formula that awards black homeowners less favorable grants than white homeowners violates both the Fair Housing Act of 1968 and the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (HCDA). Coming to the defense of the Plaintiffs, who represent themselves and over 20,000 families similarly situated, the NAACP Legal Defense Fund (LDF) agrees.
The Fair Housing Act of 1968 outlawed discrimination in housing based on race, including discrimination in the administration of housing-related programs and activities. LDF believes HUD and the LRA have violated the Fair Housing Act by denying African-American homeowners Road Home grants large enough to cover their home repairs while awarding white homeowners more appropriate grants. In addition, LDF supports the Plaintiffs’ claim that HUD and the LRA failed to administer the HCDA block grant program. LDF asks that the court require the Defendants to stop using the discriminatory formula and recalculate black homeowners’ grants based on the cost of repairing their homes. LDF’s goal is to have the Road Home achieve its stated purpose: enable all residents of New Orleans to rebuild and return home, regardless of their race.